US media is biased on global warming 08 September 04
As a journalist myself, I get pretty sick of hearing people blame the media for all of society’s ills. But with global warming at least, it turns out to be true. In a meticulous analysis of over six hundred press articles, University of California academic Maxwell Boycoff proved beyond doubt that the journalistic obsession with ‘balance’ is giving too much time to sceptics and leaving the public ignorant about the degree of scientific consensus on global warming. At least 98% of scientists competent in the climate field agree that humans are causing the planet to heat up, and yet the US media persists in giving equal airtime to a cabal of largely unqualified and industry-funded global warming deniers. “We respect the need to represent multiple viewpoints, but when generally agreed-upon scientific findings are presented side-by-side with the viewpoints of a handful of skeptics, readers are poorly served,” says Boycoff. “In this case, it contributed to public confusion and opened the door to political manoeuvering.”
Comments
Lynn Vincentnathan
September 8th, 2004 at 07:49 PM
Around 1995, when GW reached 95% certainty, there was a Nightline program responding to Al Gore’s accusation that oil money was biasing some GW science. It was in the “pro-con” format (as if half agreed & half disagree re GW). The conclusion an innocent viewer would reach is that there was no GW, or at least no concensus, and that oil money was not buying science. The sponsor of that program was Texaco.
I wrote Nightline, told them off, and suggested that at least for appearances they should get other (non-oil) sponsors when airing programs about global warming, otherwise we might think oil money was buying the media.
Vicki Falde
September 9th, 2004 at 05:41 AM
“Fair and balanced coverage,” a cornerstone of journalism that has plagued oil & gas companies throughout the Oil Age, is now their most effective weapon in hog-tying the media from giving the people straight talk about GW/CC. (Non oil & gas sponsors, not wanting to rattle the viewers that they need to consume their products, is another.)
The Oil & Gas bigwigs must be dancing in the streets…not that any of this is news to us GW-aware sorts!